All Categories

Lessons from the Sheriff Versus the Governor

3/25/2017

Lessons from the Sheriff Versus the Governor

By Susan Steffen-Kraft

While I realize this story is at least 3 years old I feel something can be learned. I actually wrote about this in 2013 but decided a rewrite was in order.

In the beginning Governor Rick Scott seemed quite conservative. He rejected federal funding of a high speed rail but bowed to pressure on the Sun Rail project. One should always beware of federal funding and he did on the high speed rail. And yet, "The bottom line is that he said he was going to protect the taxpayers, and he is clearly violating that promise," said Senator Dockery a republican, who supported Scott early in his campaign. "This will be a costly project that will be a drain on taxpayers for many years to come."

He signed a bill that required those seeking welfare under the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families to submit for drug testing.
Then he backed down. He made a lot of promises he did not keep. Whether you agree with the above or not he made these seeming conservative type promises he did not keep. He was encouraging students in some majors by reducing tuition.
All of this seems good and well but something was going to eventually burst forth that would show a different side to this man.

A courageous Sheriff Nick Finch choose to overlook a perceived concealed and carry charge against a resident of Liberty County in Florida by the name of Floyd Parish. While the man was in the cell the processing and documentation of his arrest began. After the arresting sheriff left Sheriff Finch arrived with a member of Mr. Parish's family.
The sheriff spoke to the arrested man and then he took possession of the file. Mr. Finch proceeded to release Mr. Parish because he believed in "2nd amendment rights" as he stated. And indeed the 2nd Amendment should supersede Florida law.

Now subsequently the good sheriff was arrested and later released. "According to the affidavit for arrest; Sheriff Finch is charged with one count of official misconduct as set forth in Florida State Statutes, Title 46, Chapter 838.022. Florida State Statutes, Title 46, Chapter 838.022. That section defines the crime of official misconduct — a third degree felony" — as follows:
(1) It is unlawful for a public servant, with corrupt intent to obtain a benefit for any person or to cause harm to another, to:
(a) Falsify, or cause another person to falsify, any official record or official document;
(b) Conceal, cover up, destroy, mutilate, or alter any official record or official document or cause another person to perform such an act; or
(c) Obstruct, delay, or prevent the communication of information relating to the commission of a felony that directly involves or affects the public agency or public entity served by the public servant".

Now comes Governor Scott of Florida. Instead of standing by this sheriff he went against him. Astounding! His haste to remove the sheriff from office and replace the him with someone else proves that in Florida at least, political expediency is more important then the Constitution. This was a sheriff that was elected by a majority of voters in Liberty County! The governor apparently had decided to change Liberty County to Tyranny County at least with his actions.

Apparently, a sheriff upholding the Constitution against a conservative governor who does not uphold the 2nd Amendment is not easy. Did I say conservative? Gov. Scott is suppose to be according to former actions and words. A man was accused wrongly and the sheriff stands up for that man and the 2nd Amendment, as I would expect him too. I would also expect the governor to back him.

The person who was arrested for having the concealed weapon had "illegal laws" used against him. Thus he never should have been in the system anyhow. Note that the second amendment does not say "with limitions" and new law provisions allowed Quite plainly, it states "shall not be infringed!" Nick Finch understand and knows his oath, the Constitution and what our freedoms are based on. Governor Rick Scott does not know or chooses to ignore this.

As to the arrest itself; if being placed in a jail cell means you are booked which apparently the arrested gentleman was not then the log containing his name would be in error and the sheriff had every right to white out the arrested man's name if the arrest affidavit is correct! It seems to be very detailed about what went on. There then would be room for someone's name who actually was booked into jail.

The illustrious Mr. Scott has lost much credibility in my eyes even to this day. He had the guts to say that if the Sheriff stepped down he would drop the charges. Excuse me? If Mr. Finch was guilty he should be charged and not drop those charges even if the sheriff stepped down. What kind of offer or deal was that? If I was in Florida I would really be wondering if a different governor should be in order. Mr. Scott allowed this travesty of a charge to go to trial. Wasting the taxpayers money is more like it. Many of us were shocked and angered by his stupidity. Of course the charges that Mr. Finch had falsified public records let alone destroy them was utterly ridiculous!

The Sheriff was as of Thursday Oct. 31st, 2013 found Not Guilty. On Halloween Day and he finally becomes free of this nonsense. What a Trick this was and the Not Guilty verdict was a Treat for many of us who were on the Sheriff's side.

Next, Mr. Scott allowed this travesty of a charge to go to trial. Wasting the taxpayers money is more like it. Many of us were shocked and angered by his stupidity. Of course the charges that Mr. Finch had falsified public records let alone destroyed them was utterly ridiculous!

The Sheriff was as of Thursday Oct. 31st found Not Guilty. On Halloween Day and he finally becomes free of this nonsense. What a Trick this was and the Not Guilty verdict was a Treat for many of us who were on the Sheriff's side. I had sent Gov. Scott an e-mail on his site letting him know what I thought.

I blistered him good for being so stupid. Good thing I am in Idaho or he might send a squad car to arrest me. Right now I have little respect for Governor Scott. If he does not reinstate Mr. Finch as Sheriff I believe he should be recalled.

Congratulations for the Not Guilty Verdict Mr. Finch. You deserve it. A big thanks to Sheriff Mack for sticking by and helping Sheriff Finch and to the Constitution Club for much information on this case!

The sheriff was reinstated within hours of being found Not Guilty! That does not exonerate the Governor however in my mind!

It was shameful to begin with that a good Independently elected sheriff was forced into this position by a few well connected men and politicians.
Sheriff Finch told the New American that he is grateful for all the support across the country!

My point in this blog article is that many do not realize that the that the local county sheriffs are the ultimate law of the land and not the federal government is not a new belief nor is it only something that the CSPOA which stands for 'Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association'. The federal government is "the greatest threat we face today," according to Sheriff Richard Mack. The John Birch Society of the 1950's held similar views and modern day groups such as Oath Keepers, states’ rights groups and Second Amendment activists ask for support from local sheriffs to stand up to the government of the United States of America.

Sheriff Nick Finch understood and practiced correctly that the sheriff is the ultimate law of the land. He took his duty seriously and stood behind it; whereas Gov. Rick Scott understands nothing or chooses to ignore it.

Let us hope we can all find good sheriffs like this in our states to defend the 2nd Amendment and boot out governors or anyone else who fails to defend the 2nd Amendment!

http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2011-07-02/news/os-ed-sunrail-rick-scott-070211-20110701_1_sunrail-61-mile-route-rick-scott,
http://www.ocala.com/news/20110618/some-key-decisions-ahead-for-gov-scott,
http://www.politifact.com/florida/promises/scott-o-meter/promise/600/require-drug-screening-for-welfare-recipients/,
http://freedomoutpost.com/is-governor-rick-scott-traitor-to-his-oath/,
https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/16851-sheriff-nick-finch-acquitted-immediately-reinstated-by-governor,
https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/15658-exclusive-interview-with-liberty-co-sheriff-nick-finch-i-will-never-back-down,
http://www.wctv.tv/content/news/FDLE-investigating-deadly-shooting-in-Bristol--394845921.html,,
http://www.tallahassee.com/story/news/2016/09/26/bristol-man-accused-second-degree-murder-killing-53-year-old/91132564/,
http://www.ammoland.com/2013/10/fl-sheriff-finch-goes-on-trial-for-standing-up-for-the-constitution/,
https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/16834-trial-of-liberty-county-florida-sheriff-nick-finch-begins,
https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/19000-sheriff-mack-we-re-taking-back-america-one-county-at-a-time,
www.abbreviations.com › Community › Associations
http://lawofficer.com/exclusive/sagebrush-sheriffs-form-last-line-of-defense-against-overstepping-federal-government/,
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/constitutional-sheriffs-cops-who-think-government-our-greatest-threat-n557381

1 Comment

Operation Northwoods: Could it Happen Again or Has It?

2/20/2017

0 Comments

Operation Northwoods: Could it Happen Again or Has It?

By Susan Steffen-Kraft

The name for this operation was approved by every Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Chairman had even given written approval. This operation for which the code name was Operation Northwoods, called for innocents to be shot on the streets of America and boats carrying refugees who were fleeing Cuba to be sunk on the high seas. The terrorism was to be launched in D.C., Miami and other places and then the framing of people would begin for things they had not committed. for a wave of violent terrorism to be launched in Washington, D.C., Miami, and elsewhere. People would be framed for bombings they did not commit and planes would even be hijacked. The phony evidence would then be blamed on Castro. Of course the chair who was Lemnitzer with his cabal would then have the backing from the public and international community to go to war.
Even though many Cubans hated Castro, provoking the public to revolt seemed dead and Castro, appeared to have no inclination to launch any attacks against Americans or their property. I wonder why; maybe because he was smart.
Operation Northwoods called for a war that many patriotic Americans and even innocent Cubans would die in. Senseless deaths in which the egos of generals who sat in their own safe homes and driving their fancy limos and in general living high on the hog. We the People are nobody important in their eyes; just useful tools.
One of the elaborate schemes was to "create an incident which will demonstrate convincingly that a Cuban aircraft has attacked and shot down a chartered civil airliner en route from the United States to Jamaica, Guatemala, Panama or Venezuela. The destination would be chosen only to cause the flight plan route to cross Cuba. The passengers could be a group of college students off on a holiday or any grouping of persons with a common interest to support chartering a non-scheduled flight." The plan does not actually call for killing the college students mentioned above - only seeming to kill them - the Joint Chiefs did suggest the possibility of killing some Cuban refugees, or at least wounding them, as long as there was plenty of publicity to make it all worthwhile. Although the plan did not actually call for killing the college students but only to seem to do so it does bring to mind many attacks like the Boston Marathon, Sandy Hook, and the Aurora Theater and even 9/11. (a false flag describes covert operations that are designed to deceive in such a way that activities appear as though they are being carried out by entities, groups, or nations other than those who actually planned and executed them).

Now how many were killed and how many only would seem to be killed and at which events? Makes you wonder, right? I believe they are created on purpose and that innocents die but, I also believe that there are a few planted actors at these events and much manipulating behind the scenes. Do you really trust your government and many of the top leaders from either side of the aisle. Many of the events around the world are created also by other governments and ours for an evil agenda.

"Zbigniew Brzezinski, former U.S. National Security Advisor and co-founder of the Trilateral Commission, titled his 1998 book The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives. In this seminal book on American foreign policy, Brzezinski states that because of popular resistance to U.S. military expansionism, his ambitious strategy for "American global primacy" can't be implemented "except in the circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat." (The Grand Chessboard, page 211).
This is typical thinking because many of our government and military leaders think this is a chess game. Sometimes you may have to sacrifice some of your own pieces in order to win the game. No matter the lives being snuffed out for your so called game.
Thus here is a list from pages 10-11 of a 15 page GW file on Northwoods (page 7-8 of Joint Chiefs report)

A series of well coordinated incidents will be planned to take place in and around Guantanamo to give genuine appearance of being done by hostile Cuban forces.A. Incidents to establish a credible attack:
(1)   Start rumors (many). Use clandestine radio.
(2)   Land friendly Cubans in uniform "over-the-fence" to stage attack on base.
(3)   Capture Cuban (friendly) saboteurs inside the base.
(4)   Start riots near the base main gate (friendly Cubans).
(5)   Blow up ammunition inside the base: start fires.
(6)   Burn aircraft on air base (sabotage).
(7)   Lob mortar shells from outside of base into base.
(8)   Capture assault teams approaching from the sea or vicinity of Guantanamo City.
(9)   Capture militia group which storms base.
(10)   Sabotage ship in harbor; large fires – naphthalene.
(11)   Sink ship near harbor entrance. Conduct funerals for mock-victims

Even the UN would have favored the U.S. in this because in
world opinion, and in the United Nations forum it would favorably have affected developing the international image of the Cuban government as rash and irresponsible, and as an alarming and unpredictable threat to the peace of the Western Hemisphere.

The US Joint Chiefs of Staff put out recommendations for hijacking US aircraft, staging “false flag” attacks, which are covert military operations in which they attack selected targets under the “flag” of another nation/entity in order to blame that particular entity for the attack, such as the recommendations for attacking Guantamo Bay by “friendly Cubans” and conducting a “terror campaign” within the United States, itself.

Our President, John F. Kennedy, in listening to the plan of General Lemnitzer who had jumped at the opportunity to recommend Operation Northwoods, yet deceptively spared the specific operational plans of “blowing up people on the streets of Miami and the nation’s capital and blaming it on Castro.” However, “Kennedy was not amused” and he told the general that, “we were not discussing the use of U.S. military force.”

Eventually, Kennedy replaced General Lemnitzer as he should have. The CIA is full of power hungry egotistical men and the Joint Chiefs of Staff are no better. They were part of the plotting to take out Kennedy because he refused to go along the Operation Northwoods.

"Eisenhower warned against the "influence of the interconnected relationship and organized power of the military, government, and industry, in that the growing influence of this ‘complex’ was so vast that it threatened to take over the government and subvert democracy itself. It was the functions of this complex that saw profit created through war and empire, and thus, there was a constant drive and impetus towards pursuing empire and resorting to war. If you build a massive military structure, you are going to use it; if it is profitable to go to war, you will go to war.

Was Operation Northwoods an unusual example, or are such recommendations actually common? The report noted on page four of the documents “it is assumed that there will be similar submissions from other agencies and that these inputs will be used as a basis for developing a time-phased plan.” It appears that even insofar as this “Cuba Project” was concerned, Northwoods was not alone, and in fact they probably knew this from previous experience - its uniqueness may lie not its existence but in it's eventual publication.

In fact, Mr. Bamford notes Operation Northwoods as a precedent for other events were to come. On the subject of the Gulf of Tonkin incident, the August 1964 alleged attack by North Vietnamese forces on American ships which led to direct U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War, he wrote:
“In light of the Operation Northwoods documents, it is clear that deceiving the public and trumping up wars for Americans to fight and die in was standard, approved policy at the highest levels of the Pentagon. […] One needs only replace “Guanantanamo Bay” with “Tonkin Gulf,” and “Cuba” with “North Vietnam.” The Gulf of Tonkin incident may or may not have been stage-managed, but the senior Pentagon leadership at the time was clearly capable of such deceit.”

What can we really learn here? This happened before and is happening now. The thing is, can you learn from history and not let it repeat itself? This is why I go back in time, because people refuse to learn from the past and keep repeating mistakes or allowing them to happen. One reason this happened is because the sheeple never learn.

"And the people bowed and prayed, to the Neon god they made."
Ah yes, the gods they made were the politicians and the people created them by doing homage and by continuing to vote them into office.

"And the sign flashed out its warning In the words that it was forming".
People watch the wars, disasters, and protests on television and they either disassociate or become willfully ignorant about what is going on in the world around them. They don't take any action because everything has become a "show or spectacle"

Ah yes, the gods they made were the politicians and the foolish people created them. Then they were silent until the evil came for them; then it was too late.

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/northwoods.html,
http://www.rense.com/general18/harm.htm
https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=false+flag+attacks,
http://www.wanttoknow.info/falseflag,
http://www.wanttoknow.info/010501operationnorthwoods,
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-national-security-state-and-the-assassination-of-jfk/22071,
http://12-7-9-11.blogspot.com/2006/12/northwoods-ii-special-distribution-plan.html,
https://www.reddit.com/r/Music/comments/3bajyk/what_does_the_last_verse_in_the_song_the_sound_of/

0 Comments

King George III a Conservative and George Washington a Liberal

1/21/2017

3 Comments

King George III a Conservative and George Washington a Liberal

By Susan Steffen-Kraft

The terms liberal, progressive, socialistic, populist, conservative, libertarian, and even centrist are all so mixed up that their meanings depend on those who use them as well as their motives.

Many of you no doubt think that George Washington was a Conservative. You would be wrong as King George III was the Conservative. Those who opposed the king would have been labeled Liberal and patriotic. Those who supported him would have been considered conservative. In fact, one daresay that in Europe the definition of a Conservative would have referred to, in the extreme sense, those who wished to return to a monarchy which certainly many in America did not.

In fact the word Conservative was meant to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditional ones, and to limit change. Certainly, King George III would have approved of that definition. In Europe, a conservative would probably in the extreme want to stick to a monarchy which at the time of the Revolutionary War. Some in America truly wanted to stick to the monarchy as they considered themselves his loyal subjects. They were in the true sense at the moment, conservatives.

In the end the terms political terms for liberal, progressive, socialistic, populist, conservative, libertarian, and even centrist are all so skewed that their meanings depend on those who use them as well as their motives. Certainly humans take a meaning and add to it how they want and how they think. History has proved that. G.K. Chesterton’s observation, “The business of Progressives is to go on making mistakes. The business of Conservatives is to prevent mistakes from being corrected.” There is truth aplenty to Mr. Chesterton's statement in our day and age. Does not say too much about how we define the meanings of our words.

President Washington was also a liberal and tolerant man. In a famous letter to the Jewish congregation in Newport, Rhode Island, he hailed the “liberal policy” of the United States on religious freedom as worthy of emulation by other countries. He explained, “It is now no more that toleration is spoken of as if it were the indulgence of one class of people that another enjoyed the exercise of their inherent natural rights, for, happily, the Government of the United States, which gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance, requires only that they who live under its protection should demean themselves as good citizens.”

After the Constitution was ratified things changed because a brand new set of beliefs were established. Anyone who embraced the Declaration of Independence was now a Conservative. I bet that King George III was puzzled by that one. Saying you are a Conservative and not stating a belief or the why that you are tells no one anything however.

We should define ourselves not by being Democrat or Republican or by Conservative or Liberal or by being someone who is Right or Left. No, we should define ourselves as being Americans who rally round the Constitution, Declaration of Independence and Bill of Rights. We need to realize that "governments derive their power from the consent of the governed!"

In the 1770's being rebellious for a cause was considered being a patriot but now it is considered radical. However, be careful of being rebellious because violent protests that destroy others property and injury people is beyond the pale of what our forefathers would have tolerated and does not make you a Liberal. What some do now is mindless and stupid. What was done in the 1770's was thought out and carried out for good reasons; freedom from tyranny of a Conservative and rigid king who took and did not give.

The Boston Tea Party really did not have a lot of violence and was well thought out. It happened because of taxation without representation. George Washington was all for the Revolution but not really for the destruction of private property. That being said the quote below describes how the Boston Tea Party was handled.

"Besides the destruction of the tea, historical accounts record no damage was done to any of the three ships, the crew or any other items on board the ships except a one broken padlock. The padlock was the personal property of one of the ships' captains and was promptly replaced the next day by the Patriots. Great care was taken by the Sons of Liberty to avoid the destruction of personal property-save for the cargo of British East India Company tea. Nothing was stolen or looted from the ships, not even the tea. One participant tried to steal some tea but was reprimanded and stopped. The Sons of Liberty were very careful about how the action was carried out and made sure nothing besides the tea was damaged. After the destruction of the tea, the participants swept the decks of the ships clean, and anything that was moved was put back in its proper place. The crews of the ships attested to the fact there had been no damage to any of the ships except for the destruction of their cargoes of tea.

My oh my, today's protesters could learn a whole lot. But they are not true liberals in the sense Washington was nor are they like The Sons of Liberty.

https://beyondthecusp.wordpress.com/2011/09/07/right-vs-left-liberal-vs-conservative-america-vs-europe/,
http://constitutionclub.ning.com/main/search/search?q=George+Washington+was+a+Liberal,
http://www.thomhartmann.com/users/demartman/blog/2016/08/george-washington-said-he-was-liberal-and-always-hoped-would-be-liberal,
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/conservative
http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/history/item/24904-george-washington-s-rules-for-the-radically-right,
https://www.bostonteapartyship.com/boston-tea-party-facts

3 Comments

Quotes to Learn From Our Founding Fathers

1/8/2017

2 Comments

Quotes to Learn From Our Founding Fathers

By Susan Steffen-Kraft

The liberties of a people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them.
Patrick Henry, American colonial revolutionary

The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government – lest it come to dominate our lives and interests.
Patrick Henry

Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!
Patrick Henry to the Virginia House of Burgesses, 1775

Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!
Benjamin Franklin

We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall hang separately!
Benjamin Franklin

The deliberations of the Constitutional Convention of 1787 were held in strict secrecy. Consequently, anxious citizens gathered outside Independence Hall when the proceedings ended in order to learn what had been produced behind closed doors. The answer was provided immediately. A Mrs. Powel of Philadelphia asked Benjamin Franklin, “Well, Doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?” With no hesitation whatsoever, Franklin responded, “A republic, if you can keep it.”
Benjamin Franklin

It is the duty of the patriot to protect his country from its government.
Thomas Paine

Hold on, my friends, to the Constitution and to the Republic for which it stands. Miracles do not cluster, and what has happened once in 6000 years, may not happen again. Hold on to the Constitution, for if the American Constitution should fail, there will be anarchy throughout the world.
Daniel Webster

We the People are the rightful masters of both Congress and the Courts–not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.
Abraham Lincoln

“The more people who own little businesses of their own, the safer our country will be, and the better off its cities and towns; for the people who have a stake in their country and their community are its best citizens.”
John Hancock

“There! His Majesty can now read my name without glasses. And he can double the reward on my head!”
John Hancock

Of all the enemies to public liberty, war is perhaps the most to be dreaded, because it comprises and develops the germ of every other. War is the parent of armies; from these proceed debts and taxes; and armies, debts, and taxes are the known instruments for bringing the many under the domination of the few … No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare. – James Madison

"History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse,
intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over
governments by controlling money and its issuance."
President James Madison

America does not go abroad in search of monsters to destroy. She is the well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all. She well knows that by enlisting under other banners than her own, were they even the banners of foreign independence, she would involve herself beyond the power of extrication in all the wars of interest and intrigue, of individual avarice, envy and ambition, which assume the colors and usurp the standards of freedom. – John Quincy Adams (1821)

Not a place upon earth might be so happy as America. Her situation is remote from all the wrangling world, and she has nothing to do but to trade with them.
Thomas Paine (1776)

I have ever deemed it fundamental for the United States never to take active part in the quarrels of Europe. Their political interests are entirely distinct from ours. Their mutual jealousies, their balance of power, their complicated alliances, their forms and principles of government, are all foreign to us. They are nations of eternal war.
Thomas Jefferson (1823)

Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations; entangling alliances with none.
Thomas Jefferson

It is in the interest of tyrants to reduce the people to ignorance and vice. For they cannot live in any country where virtue and knowledge prevail.
Samuel Adams

It is no dishonor to be in a minority in the cause of liberty and virtue
Samuel Adams

But what do we mean by the American Revolution? Do we mean the American war? The Revolution was effected before the war commenced. The Revolution was in the minds and hearts of the people; a change in their religious sentiments, of their duties and obligations...This radical change in the principles, opinions, sentiments, and affections of the people was the real American Revolution.
John Adams, letter to H. Niles, February 13,1818

The government must be a weak one indeed, if it should forget that the good of the whole can only be promoted by advancing the good of each of the parts or members which compose the whole.
John Jay The Federalist Papers Federalist No. 64
Categories: Government
Date: March 5, 1788

I consider knowledge to be the soul of a republic, and as the weak and wicked are generally in alliance, as much care should be taken to diminish the number of the former as of that latter. Education is the way to do this, and nothing should be left undone to afford all ranks of people that means of obtaining a proper degree of it at a cheap and easy rate.
John Jay to Benjamin Rush - March 21, 1785

No power on earth has a right to take our property from us without our consent. John Jay
When a government betrays the people by amassing too much power and becoming tyrannical, the people have no choice but to exercise their original right of self-defense — to fight the government.
Alexander Hamilton

"Never did a government commence under auspices so favorable, nor ever was success so complete. If we look to the history of other nations, ancient or modern, we find no example of a growth so rapid, so gigantic, of a people so prosperous and happy." Stated during the First Inaugural Address of James Monroe on Tuesday, March 4, 1817.

National honor is the national property of the highest value. James Monroe

In the wars of the European powers in matters relating to themselves we have never taken any part, not does it comport with our policy so to do. It is only when our rights are invaded or seriously menaced that we resent injuries or make preparation for our defense.
James Monroe

“At no period of our political existence had we so much cause to felicitate ourselves at the prosperous and happy condition of our country.”
James Monroe

Give all the power to the many, they will oppress the few. Give all the power to the few, they will oppress the many.
Alexander Hamilton

It has been observed that a pure democracy if it were practicable would be the most perfect government. Experience has proved that no position is more false than this. The ancient democracies in which the people themselves deliberated never possessed one good feature of government. Their very character was tyranny; their figure deformity.
Alexander Hamilton

Comment from Susan:
I love reading the quotes from these intelligent men who founded our country. We can learn so much and there are so many more quotes it would fill a book ....a huge one. Sadly, we have not heeded their wisdom and if they could see this country today they would be ashamed of what we have allowed. The ignorance of people in not following their wisdom and appreciating their sacrifices is very sad indeed. You are here in this country because of their actions or this country would not exist today. They rebelled and fought their own country; Great Britain and their king, King George. You owe them so much and all I see from so many is non-appreciation and whining for more and more and more. Get over it and be grateful and that goes for today's government also. They certainly want more and more and more from We the People. That is not the way it was suppose to be.

,
http://www.breitbart.com/blog/2014/07/04/independence-day-quotes-from-america-s-founding-father-s/,
http://www.patriotnewsalert.com/Founding%20Father%20Quotes.htm,
https://www.cancertutor.com/quotes_presidents/,
http://www.americanrevival.org/quotes/forefathers.htm,
http://www.marksquotes.com/Founding-Fathers/Adams/index3.htm.
http://www.westillholdthesetruths.org/quotes/author/john-jay,
http://www.foundingfatherquotes.com/father/id/64,
http://www.qotd.org/search/single.html?qid=35002,
http://www.sonsoflibertytees.com/apps/quotes/author.php?ID=61
http://americanhistory.about.com/cs/jamesmonroe/a/quotemonroe.htm,
https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/j/james_monroe.html,
http://thehistoryjunkie.com/james-monroe-facts/,
http://www.azquotes.com/author/6160-Alexander_Hamilton,
http://www.ourrepubliconline.com/Author/21

2 Comments

Orca versus Shark....What can we learn?

12/19/2016

7 Comments

Ovca versus Shark....What can we Learn?

By Susan Steffen-Kraft

A satire is usually meant to be humorous, however, the greater purpose is constructive social which uses wit to draw the attention to particular and wider issues in our society. I shall attempt to do this in my blog with satire.

The above picture is of a killer whale better know as an Orca killing a great white shark. What in the world you may ask? What could this possibly have to do with any political agenda? Below is the video that started me on this unusual journey.

Some of the burning questions that should be asked are, "Were the Russians involved?" Since they are getting blamed for everything else, I have to wonder about this.
Since it sounds like a hate crime will our government ban killer whales from shark hunting? Can our governement even be trusted to be objective?

Is this a violation of the Endangered Species Act? The Great Whites are endangered from years of being hunted by people for its fins and teeth. Great White sharks also get overhunted as trophies in sport fishing, according to the World Wildlife Fund, but since they are endangered, how does one ban the Orcas from hunting them? Perhaps a study is in order however since the Orcas are in violation of the Act.

For your edification the Endangered Species Act of 1969 now known as ESA and signed in 1973 provides for the conservation of endangered and threatened species. This covers a huge portion of their range and the ecosystems on which they depend.

According to a 2016 State of the Climate Report:

Climate change causes more hurricanes
Climate change causes less hurricanes
Climate change causes more rain (but less water)
Climate change causes less rain
Climate change decreases the spread of malaria
Climate change increases the spread of malaria
Climate change makes San Francisco foggier
Climate change makes San Francisco less foggy
Climate change causes duller autumn leaves
Climate change causes more colorful autumn leaves
Climate change makes for less salty seas
Climate change makes for saltier seas
Climate change causes Antarctica to lose land ice
Climate change causes Antarctica to gain land ice

Could we be on the verge of discovery that Orcas are killing the Great Whites because Global Warming made them do it? I too breathlessly await for that titbit of information from Al Gore and other Global Warming enthusiasts.

Now about Peta. What will they do about this? Not to say everything about Peta is wrong but some stuff is stupid like the fact that they feel milk is a racist drink. I too am puzzled by that one. PETA is committed to a future in which people would not be able to own pets, claiming on their website

"The selfish desire to possess animals and receive love from them causes immeasurable suffering." Now, those are a few of the far-fetched things but will they defend this shark and any sharks from the cruelty of being eaten alive by the killer whales? I mean they seem to feel that shearing sheep and milking cows is horrible? I feel they should step into the fray on this issue.

Bullying is not something I approve of. So many groups are speaking out against bullyng that I have to say Whoa, what was the Orca whale doing to the shark and why? There are laws against bullying and in fact a little too many. Teachers and parents should be speaking up and not the government or the law.

So will anti-bullying groups address this issue with the whale eating the shark? It is a clear case of bullying and as for the reason....was he/she smaller, white, ugly, old, young, female/male, or what? This truly calls for investigation and study. Perhaps a government grant is in order on this issue.

As to the Black Lives Matters movement. Now here is a matter for them to consider; Do Sharks Lives Matter and should we stop Whale Brutality? Would a few of the BLM people volunteer to do some studies, diving, and camera work to figure this whole thing out. In the end should a statement from the BLM on this topic be this; Fins Up....Don't Eat Me Bro!?

These are some of the Burning questions that should be asked and thoughts that should be contemplated.

The above is Mother Nature at it's rawest. We see it and it is not pretty and neither are humans and how they act. I hope this satire makes you think just a little bit and I am sure I will take some flack. Per example police with a bad attitude and certain groups with a bad attitude towards them make the Shark and Orcas look pretty tame by comparison. Sigh! It is after all just a satire!

http://akdart.com/warming14.html,
http://www.theverge.com/2016/12/15/13977140/watch-whales-eat-shark-alive-video-monterey-bay,
https://www.reference.com/pets-animals/great-white-shark-endangered-4c62150bdc3707ca,
http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/laws/esa/,
http://www.mamamia.com.au/peta-shearing-australia/.
http://listverse.com/2013/05/30/10-insane-facts-about-peta/

7 Comments

Will We Ever Learn What is Important?

12/3/2016

0 Comments

Will We Ever Learn What is Important?

By Susan Steffen-Kraft

Amidst the horror of protestors that are destroying things in their anger at Trump being elected, amidst the anger of people directed at each over most anything, amidst the anger at police and I will say that some anger is warrented but some is not. Amidst the sports figures and others that protest against their flag and anthem and amidst the anger and violence people commit against each other and the destruction of property; in other words, destroying others dreams. Amidst our government high-ups and other world leaders that go against their own people for power and control and amidst religious persecution from some belief systems comes this; the realization that many have no clue about the thankfulness they should have for just being alive and for what they have. Life is precious and for those from who it is snatched well, perhaps we can learn from it. Here is one story.

Early Tuesday morning the of Nov. 29, 2016 a plane went down. Not just any plane, but a plane filled with the hopes and dreams of a soccer team that had never made it to the big final before. They had been playing in the fourth division — the equivalent of baseball’s low minor leagues — less than a decade ago. This was the team from Chapecoense and their joy at their Cinderella run is a story in itself. It was not to be despite the expectations and the march of this incredible journey. Instead, the plane broke into pieces killing 75 people with only 6 surviving (they had hoped to find more survivors but have not). Chapecoense was truly the little club that could because they were, as of a few years ago, having struggles! But this time, they became the giant slayers and most soccer fans were pulling for them.

Brazilian President Michel Temer is declaring three days of official mourning and I understand a little bit the terrible shock this town and country is going through let alone the families. The above pictures are of Alan Ruschel, one of the team’s defenders who Snapchatted photos of him and goalkeeper Danilo Padhila while on board the plane. Both of these players were pulled from the wreckage alive, though Padhila died shortly after being in the hospital.

The Medellin-based Atletico Nacional said it was asking the South American soccer confederation to give the Copa Sudamericana title to Chape as a tribute to the players who died! "“You came here for your dream,” Nacional said in a tweet. “Now you will leave as legends.” A wonderful gesture considering they were the team that Chapecoense Real was to meet in the final.

Amidst the chaos going on in this country it is heartwarming to read about this gesture from the opposition. A lesson we should all learn from. In addition to this, some of Brazil's top clubs said they want to give players to Chape on a free loan for the 2017 season. They also made the statement that the club should not be relegated to the second division for three years as it recovers from the disaster. Amazing gestures and the world and our country should take a lesson and learn from this tragedy.

Below are two pictures; the one on the left of rioters who are destroying things and the picture on the right of Brazil and Colombia coming together as more than a 100,000 fans mourn the Chapecoense soccer team tragedy. A contrast of what it should and should not be.

Nothing is perfect and even in Brazil there are troubles. Brazil has been grappling with extraordinary upheaval this year, including from the impeachment to its president to a very severe economic crises and an array of political corruption scandals. And in the world of Brazilian sports alone, the United States Justice Department had indicted the most powerful executives in Brazilian soccer on graft charges.

The 2016 Summer Olympics had a former governor from that country who helped land the 2016 Summer Olympics who is now in jail. Apparently, he has charges against him that he took bribes in a deal to renovate the city's Maracana stadium. Despite all of this, the joy and love for this team has touched people's hearts. Many are stunned with the news of this tragedy and are pulling together in their grief.

And yet, the appaling scandals and nonsense go on in the USA and the world. Many are ungrateful and have time on their hands to loot, riot and protest. They could take a lesson from the little team that could and did until life and their dreams were snatched from them.

One of the players had just found out he was to become a dad and he was so happy. Others were just happy to be achieving a goal and a dream. I have seen pictures of some of these handsome, smiling young men on their way to the fairy tale championship game. We sit here, and I too am guilty, and we think of our problems and bitch and moan. We have a right to do that but....remember when these things happen how much we have and are blessed with.

Our protestors have no clue what is truly important in life. They destroy other's dreams with no remorse while tragedies like this happen and I scarcely understand how they can be act that way. These young men truly knew what it was to sacrifice and to fight for a dream. There are others here in our own country that scream for freebies and achieve nothing!
That is truly a tragic waste in and of itself. They are the ones who have not learned.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/colombia-plane-crash-survivors-fight-for-life-as-tragic-tales-emerge/news-story/98bf4f71518757bf8b7ceeb872d9a612,
https://www.yahoo.com/news/chapecoense-players-post-photos-crash-181815046.html?soc_src=mail&soc_trk=ma,
http://sports.yahoo.com/photos/fans-gather-mourn-chapecoense-players-slideshow-wp-190053906/p-supporters-brazil-soccer-team-photo-190053470.html,
http://abcnews.go.com/Sports/wireStory/brazilian-club-chapecoense-aboard-plane-crashed-43840050,
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/29/world/americas/plane-carrying-brazilian-soccer-team-crashes-in-colombia.html?_r=0,
http://www.latimes.com/sports/soccer/la-sp-chapecoense-crash-20161129-story.html

0 Comments

Liberty and the 2nd Amendment

10/27/2016

2 Comments

Liberty and the 2nd Amendment

By Susan Steffen-Kraft

Let's define the word militia. It simply means a citizen army which is different from a professional army. The people of this country have a right to keep and bear arms. Listen to what Aristotle says. He identified the right to keep and bear arms as synonymous with the word citizenship. A citizen is one who by law is a recognized subject or national of a state or commonwealth. They can be native or naturalized. legally recognized subject or national of a state or commonwealth, either native or naturalized and this is from www.merriman-webster.com. So Aristotle stated "those who possess arms are the citizens." Well regulated for the record means well trained.

Now you might well ask and wonder what dog does she have in this fight? I state for the record, that up to this point in my life I have never owned a gun, so I am actually neutral in this except for one thing; I believe in the 2nd Amendment which is part of the Constitution. I will defend other people's rights to own and bear arms but only if, of course, they are citizens. As far as defending myself....knives, pepper spray, wasp spray, baseball bats, etc. are quite useful and at this point still legal. These are the weapons of my choosing at this time; whether that will change or not I cannot tell you. I firmly believe you should be able to defend yourself and your family if necessary and by whatever means you have available. Don't agree with that....Tough!

If they take away your right to defend with a gun then next will be our knives, pepper spray, baseball bats, karate, judo, and so on. The government is control hungry and will not stop at your guns; you are foolish you if you think so.
To say that guns are to blame for a crime then, if you believe in and read the Bible, you should know that Cain who committed the first murder did not own a gun. Thus, murders can occur in any way, shape and form so we would have to ban pillows for example that have been used to smother someone. Silly, right?

An open letter from a soldier who had to deal with a second shooting at Fort Hood, Texas because of the politics that brings about a politically gun free zone states that:

“My name is First Lieutenant Patrick Cook of the 49th Transportation Battalion, Fort Hood, Texas. . . I found myself trapped in an enclosed room with fourteen of my fellow Soldiers, one of whom was barricading the door against a madman with a .45 pistol when he was fatally shot. . .
"I knew this was going to happen. I had been saying for five years that Fort Hood was a tinderbox of another massacre waiting to happen. It had to happen, because our betters failed to learn the obvious lesson of five years ago [when U.S. Army major and psychiatrist Nidal Hasan, fatally shot 13 people and injured more than 30 others]. Worse yet, I know it will happen again. More will die, more will be wounded, more families will be torn apart, needlessly. It happened again, and will happen again, because Fort Hood is a gun free zone . . .

“When the first shots rang out, my hand reached to my belt for something that wasn’t there. Something that could have put a stop to the bloodshed, could have made it merely an ‘ugly incident’ instead of the horrific massacre that I will surely remember as the darkest twenty minutes of my life. Stripped of my God-given Right to arm myself, the only defensive posture I had left was to lie prostrate on the ground, and wait to die".

This is what we have come too, that soldiers have no guns at times. Law abiding citizens are one of the deterrents to stopping someone who is more than willing to murder others such as the Ft. Hood shooter to give an example. That even military had no protection at that moment and time is rotten to say the least.

Gun control is so much more than controlling crime. It’s about disarming We the People and that way we are easier to control. So why do you think the founders included the Second Amendment. Well it's not about hunting but about self-preservation and making sure a tyrannical government does not take hold here in America. As for hunting, no one wants to see people lose that right either, because although some do it for sport, many do it for food also. You need to let people that are for gun control that there are evil people in this old world of ours and the government can't protect us from everyone and everything.

“The Constitution of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed,” stated Jefferson in a letter to John Cartwright on June 5, 1824.
The unalienable right to freedom from violent harm, and the right to self-defense, both exist before and outside of secular government. Below are four examples of this:

1. Torah: Exodus 22:2.

2. Talmud: Jewish law set forth in the Talmud states, “If someone comes to kill you, arise quickly and kill him.” (Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin. 1994,2, 72a; The Babylonian Talmud: Tractate Berakoth. 1990, 58a, 62b).

3. Roman Catholic Doctrine: Christian doctrine has long asserted the right and duty of self defense. “Someone who defends his life is not guilty of murder even if he is forced to deal his aggressor a lethal blow.” See Catechism of the Catholic Church 1994, sections 2263-65 (citing and quoting Thomas Aquinas).

4. Protestant Doctrine: Individual has personal and unalienable right to self-defense, even against government. Samuel Rutherford, Lex, Rex [1644]1982, pp. 159-166, 183-185 (Sprinkle Publications edition.) Jesus advised his disciples to arm themselves in view of likely persecution. Luke 22:36

November 2014 is when the people in New York found out that people who had died would have the guns that the family would have inherited collected from them; even though most would have had gun permits. Buffalo police are now checking to see if gun owners are living and if not trying to find out what happened to those guns. Tom King, who is the president of the New York State Pistol & Rifle Association has accused Derrenda, who is the Buffalo Police Commissioner of misleading the public about the law.
“They’re quick to say they’re going to take the guns,” King said. “But they don’t tell you the law doesn’t apply to long guns, or that these families can sell [their loved one’s] pistol or apply to keep it.”

The law and other jurisdiction in New York State are trying to enforce State Penal Law 265.20 (f)actually does not call for gun confiscation but it requires those who inherit the weapon to dispose of the weapon or turn it over to an “appropriate official.” Under the law, police agencies can hold weapons for up to two years before disposing of them.

“These gun collections can value into the hundreds of thousands,” Saraceno told Fox News. “If a police officer came to my door without a warrant signed by a judge, I’m not giving them anything. Most people don’t know that and get intimidated.”
Now do you honestly think that they will destroy something that valuable? Heck no! They will sell or keep them for themselves. Civil Forfeiture in which the police get to keep things and or sell them is in my opinion similar to some degree.

We also have the UN's attempt at involvement in our 2nd Amendment rights. Their Arms Control Association makes this very clear: "The Arms Trade Treaty requires all states to 'establish and maintain a national control system, including a national control list' and 'designate competent national authorities in order to have an effective and transparent national control system regulating the transfer of conventional arms.'"

If you know me you know I have no respect or love for the UN. Get Us Out of the UN and get the UN out of the U.S.
The UN has tried to intervene itself into the United States by trying to get us to have very strict gun control laws. The human rights chief Zeid Ra'ad Hussein has urged for America to stop the "preventable violent attacks" with "legal framework" that apparently other countries use. Well, he can go to "hell in a hand basket"! He has no business telling us anything. Furthermore the Secretary of State, Mr. John Kerry has illegally and in violation of the Constitution of our country has signed the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty. President Obama has done enough to bring in Steps 6 &7 in this United Nations disarmament plan. These two are listed below:

“6. Finally, codification of laws to completely makes any and all firearms illegal to own, possess or use outside of military and law enforcement usage.

7. Creation of a United Nations Police Task force with the specific mission of assisting member nations with the collection of weaponry from civilian hands”.

If the 2nd Amendment is the law of the land then legislation that infringes on those inalienable rights, is most definitely unjust and against our Constitution. Is would be illegal, if it presented upon to vote, for this kind of legislation. There is an oath to protect the Constitution and anyone who takes that oath is then violating what they swore to protect. This is done in such a manner that it is recorder as evidence thus we should have recourse against them.

Police who swore the same oath and attempt, whether they are successful or not, to confiscate any arms, are now criminals also. Of course, where an actual crime is involved then this would not be true.
Judges can do their jobs or violate the Constitution from the bench. The courts have the records of evidence that they committed the highest of crimes. I suspect that many would be tossed if we pursued this and showed to the public their own admission of their crime. We the citizens and we who vote should expect our politicians, lawyers, judges, sheriffs, and the police to honor the oaths they swore.

They all know the law and we should make no exceptions about this. Break the law and you are finished. That is what they do to someone like you and me who are not part of these professions. Pleading ignorance does not work and they all should be held to a high standard.

Signer of the Constitution Gouverneur Morris wrote: “Americans need never fear their government because of the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation.”

Maybe fear of stupidity should be what he should have written. It has become crazy when a child is suspended from school for supposedly nibbling a pop tart into the shape of a gun. Indeed, one might say that sheer lunacy is now the norm. He was seven at the time (March 1, 2013) and three years later the settlement finally came to an end in favor of the child. Seriously, whatever were they thinking? I would be more concerned that the Pop Tart was unhealthy for the child with the junk that is in Pop Tarts.

Next on the list of obsession with getting rid of guns is the fear that a Buzz Lightyear toy apparently resembles one. Yes, a five year old child lost his toy due to the stupidity of TSA agents. Taking a toy from a five year old who is crying his eyes out because his toy is taken hardly helps with National Security.
After a lot of upset the TSA finally returned the toy at a later date. Most definitely, they should have.
These examples are just two of the things that have happened when fanatics who are about getting rid of the 2nd Amendment and guns have their way.

Also have any of you made note that politicians who are favorable towards gun control still have bodyguards even in a gun-free zone. Those bodyguard pack heat and apparently the secret Service and other bodyguard types don't trust "No guns allowed" to keep the politicians they are guarding safe
If you preach it you should live it. Thus anyone in favor of this should give up their bodyguards packing heat and rely on whatever methods they choose for protection other then guns and guards.

Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people's liberty teeth and keystone under independence.... From the hour the Pilgrims landed to the present day, events, occurrences, and tendencies prove that to ensure peace, security, and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable.... The very atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference; they deserve a place of honor with all that's good... A free people ought to be armed. - George Washington

I am closing this blog article with an old story from an old Readers Digest. Fits the gun control mentality I would say.

One day Mel Martin stopped by the chambers of a judge with whom he had a lunch appointment. As his friend changed from robe to jacket, Martin noticed a shiny black pistol holstered to the judge's shoulder.
The judge was a a firearms enthusiast, so Martin asked him why he was carrying it. His friend said that because of recent threats he had borrowed the pistol from the repository of confiscated weapons. Holding it up, the judge said, "I chose this one because it's so mean-looking, yet it hardly weighs a thing. I hope I don't need it, because I don't even know how to load it."
It's not hard," Martin said, examining it closely. "We can fill it at the water fountain on the way out."

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/04/what_does_the_second_amendment_mean.html,
http://www.jbs.org/mobile/jbs-news/featured-news/item/18289-another-attack-on-the-second-amendment,
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/23241-trump-vs-clinton-on-gun-control-second-amendment,
http://constitutionclub.ning.com/forum/topics/we-will-not-comply-initiative-594-washington-state?xg_source=msg_mes_network,
http://godfatherpolitics.com/this-is-why-the-second-amendment-was-added-to-the-bill-of-rights/,
http://jpfo.org/filegen-n-z/six-about-2nd.htm,
http://www.offthegridnews.com/current-events/police-in-this-city-found-sneaky-way-to-confiscate-legal-guns/,
http://www.dcclothesline.com/2014/11/15/gun-confiscation-begins-ny-via-dead-family-members/,
http://www.dailywire.com/news/6604/un-wants-more-american-gun-control-aaron-bandler,
http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2015/08/25/thanks-to-congress-the-un-plot-to-confiscate-american-guns-took-a-giant-step-forward/,
http://www.wnd.com/2016/09/intent-of-2nd-amendment-is-crystal-clear/,
http://patch.com/maryland/annapolis/pop-tart-gun-school-suspension-case-settled-after-3-years,
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/buzz-lightyear-toy-looked-gun-crying-child-article-1.2442557,
https://www.gungoddess.com/pro-gun-quotes/

2 Comments

Who's Afraid of the Big Bad Julian?

10/26/2016

2 Comments

Who's Afraid of the Big Bad Julian?

By Susan Steffen-Kraft

Julian Assange is the top dog mover and shaker of Wikileaks which exists wherever he is. But, he does have hundreds of volunteers from around the world who help shore up the Web site’s complicated framework. Many help in small ways but, between three and five people dedicate themselves to it full time. The important members are only known by initials as, per example, an M, because they are trying to keep the secrets of Wikileaks; so these key people's anonymity must be protected.

Assange has come to understand and has embraced the fact that the definition of human struggle is not so much left versus right or even faith versus reason. For him it is an individual versus an institution which, to my understanding, would define government and or those who wish to control at an institutional level.
When communications were conducted by encrypted online, those chat services published a classified military report, which were created by the Army Counterintelligence Center in 2008. They argued that the site was a potential threat to the Army and briefly speculated on ways to deter government employees from leaking documents to it. Assange regarded the report as a declaration of war, and posted it with the title “U.S. Intelligence Planned to Destroy WikiLeaks.”

The First Amendment is being violated by the United States’s, and in their frantic attempt to build a case against Assange WikiLeaks which, to their way of thinking, has become serious, sinister, and frightening. Several things were put together by a grand jury in secret, I might add, in Alexandria, Virginia and there have been invasive searches of the WikiLeaks staff and surveillance of WikiLeaks supporters. There have been attempts to discredit, bankrupt, and destroy Mr. Assange to boot.

Many people of all ilk have demanded his release and this list includes Michael Moore, Noam Chomsky, Ai Wei Wei, and Patti Smith. “All who care about freedom of information should demand that the threats made against Julian should be lifted,” said British filmmaker Ken Loach, who was among the participants on June 19th, 2016 when people were supporting Assange because of the five year anniversary of his taking refuge in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. “He should be able to leave his place of safety without fear of deportation or being handed over to those who intend him harm.”

Our government seems to not be held accountable for forcing truth-tellers into prison and exile. We here in this country do not deserve a government that does this. There is absolutely no reason whatsoever for a publisher like Assange and the whistleblowers like Manning and Snowden to be paying for this by giving up their liberty. Shame on our government for doing this.

Assange has exposed war crimes and cover-ups, serious abuses of state power besides pioneering a system of publication and collaborating with the media and human-rights group. He has the journalistic efforts of the Panama Papers while also stirring other news organizations to copy the breakthrough or revolutionary ideas of WikiLeaks and at the same time to have source protection. If I was exposing stuff to Mr. Assange or someone else, I would want source protection, wouldn't you? When Assange started Wikileaks his mission was to expose the secrecy, lies and misbehavior so prevalent in governments today.

Oddly, some conservatives don't care for him either. They wish to honor their country and to support their nation. So his way of doing things upsets their apple cart. Tough! I could care less! He is not our enemy but our government seems to be doing a hell of a job being the one who is the true enemy. He is exposing large and serious crimes committed by people you trust. Good job I say! So conservatives; pull up your big girl undies or skivvies and deal with it. As for liberals, some just hate him in general; particularly Hillary Clinton and President Obama.

What makes those who want to punish him so afraid? I am guessing that it is because he has published the truth about so many including Hillary Clinton. Julian was scheduled to do to give a speech revealing a October 2016 surprise and when he did not many condemned him but they spoke too soon. With good reason he did not do so, and it was because "Clinton had once asked “Can’t we just drone this guy?” referring to Assange, "He is a soft target walking around freely and thumbing his nose without any fear of reprisals from the United States."

You see the killing of Assange is not something she wants to do to protect America but to hide her sins and the President's sins. You step out on a balcony when your life has been threatened and there are "security threats!" Please, I invite you to be my guest.

As reported on Oct. 25, 2016 from WND Julian Assange got a question from MSNBC and Bloomberg senior political analyst Mark Halperin that was scribbled on a piece of paper. The question was "What aspect of the Podesta e-mails do you think the the U.S. media has under-reported?" The note came back (because Julian was very busy and could not give an interview) with one word Julian had written back to him..."Everything". It was later confirmed as the real thing by Assange's lawyer. So there you are, everything has been ignored.

Now, ask yourself why the powerful and almighty Hillary would be scared of Julian Assange? Could it be because he has proof of things on her hidden and evil deeds like he has had on others. I would say so! You have no reason to threaten someone unless your deeds being exposed will come to the light of day.

One such example is that this summer the people in Assange's group leaked embarrassing emails from the DNC which showed disdain for Bernie Sanders and his campaign for the Democrat nomination. The emails numbered into the thousands. As a result of this, the Chairwoman of the DNC, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, resigned in complete disgrace the night before the Democrat convention. It could not have happened to a finer person; sarcasm intended.

Of course when he was exposing George Bush the liberal types cheered and loved him. But now, he is after the camp of Clinton and it is a different story. So now, some conservatives are cheering for him and waiting with baited breath for each leak that might expose more of her. Clinton should be thrilled that Bush stated that Julian Assange "has willfully and repeatedly done great harm to the interests of the United States." Well so did you sir, so did you. That being said, Bush needed to be exposed then as does Hillary now!

Anyone who does their deeds in secret needs to be exposed. Job 12:22 states that " He reveals the deep things of darkness and brings deep shadows into the light. Oh, they will have their day when justice happens and all is known; it may not happen now, but it will, yes it will.

John Kerry, that unprincipled mouthpiece of evil wants a favor from Ecuador. He met with the officials of that country on unofficial business. Ecuador a favor. This taxpayer-funded man tried to get the country of Ecuador to come down on Assange and prevent him from publishing the emails on Hillary. He is a master of deceit! Of course the U.S. is denying that they asked the Ecuadorian Embassy to do anything. Right! And I have a piece of of the Brooklyn Bridge to sell you.

Oct. 19 2016 the following statement by Assange has claimed that a state actor has cut his link to the internet.
And all this do to his questions about the Democratic primaries and character questions about Hillary Clinton. My, my! More than a little strange and troubling.
WikiLeaks has also sent out three strange messages, each of them addressed to a different “state actor.”:
pre-commitment

1: John Kerry 4bb96075acadc3d80b5ac872874c3037a386f4f595fe99e687439aabd0219809
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) October 16, 2016
pre-commitment
2: Ecuador
eae5c9b064ed649ba468f0800abf8b56ae5cfe355b93b1ce90a1b92a48a9ab72
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) October 16, 2016
pre-commitment
3: UK FCO f33a6de5c627e3270ed3e02f62cd0c857467a780cf6123d2172d80d02a072f74
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) October 16, 2016

The numbers could be a possible “dead man’s switch,” which is intended to leak files if Assange’s dies and I would impagine in a questionable situation. This would also correlate with WikiLeaks’ who has mentioned “contingency plans.” There is also the fact that the site itself isn’t sure which of these three possible actors is responsible for severing Assange’s internet access. Perhaps in truth all three are involved in the plot together. This story is going to get more interesting before it’s all said and done with especially since the country of Ecuador decided to shut down his internet for the length of the presidential campaign. They do not want their "policy of non-intervention to be misunderstood by actors in our country and even domestically in Ecuador" since the face the dilemma of appearing to interfere with our elections and thus retaliation may happen next year during their elections. Assange himself has said he’s sitting on more information even more explosive than he’s released thus far. It is possibly the tip of the iceberg and what we have seen is already very revealing. This shows how desperate they are as Julian has accused the Clinton campaign of attacking the servers used by WikiLeaks. Assange claimed, "They attacked our servers and attempted hacking attacks and there is an amazing ongoing campaign where state documents were put in the UN and British courts to accuse me of being both a Russian spy and a pedophile,” he added.
And the show goes on!!!!

In the above video it talks of one of the only things I agree with the UN on; that Mr. Assange has been held for over 5 years and that really angers me. But maybe he won't have to worry about that now as now rumors are going around he is dead. It may be awhile before we know the truth. I hope to God he is not.

But back to the question which I am asking of how the US can charge a non-US citizen with any crime for something or anything when it is outside of US soil. I really don't understand why his country of origin would allow him to be tried either since it opens up the can of worms that another government from any country could try anyone for any law on its books.
Ask our government that question and they will make up a fluff answer.
According to the message sent by WikiLeaks ✔@wikileaks at 8:47 PM - 20 Oct 2016
There is:
no US election. There is power consolidation. Rigged primary, rigged media and rigged 'pied piper' candidate drive consolidation.
I thoroughly believe him because Hillary has endured investigations, corruption and collusion between the FBI and the State Dept. not to leave out media collusion, and so much more including the DNC inciting violence at rallies. She is still walking free and clear and seemingly untouchable. The sheeple of the DNC and the RINOs of the Republican party want her in. If George Bush had done all this he would be in prison. In all actuality he too lied and covered up stuff.

Moving on to the crime of his raping a few women that the Swedish government is so determined to prosecute him on. I have never read of such a muddled mess about the crime of rape. Apparently, having sex in that loose-as-a-goose country without a condom brings with it a term of imprisonment of two years because there was no condom. Consensual sex that started out with a condom ended up without one so thus, the sex was not consensual. Say what? I am confused! Alright, then!

We now move to The Swedish Public Prosecutor's Office which has been embarrassed in August this year and with good reason. They had leaked to the media that they were seeking to arrest Assange for rape.
Now, bear in mind that they withdrew the arrest warrant on the same day because in their own words there was "no evidence!" For Pete's sake, what is law and what is not here? Sweden should be the one on trial for stupidity. Thus, the evidence against him is precarious at best and stupid at worst.

To top it off, feminists of the West are raising questions about the investigation and renewed confusion as to whether the country of Sweden has issued charges against Mr. Assange. Women by the name of Naomi Klein, Naomi Wolf and a group called Women Against Rape from Europe have questioned the nature and purpose of the prosecution; they are not the only ones, as having read Sweden's garbled law, so do I.

The above video should be entitled Hillary Clinton: Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire.

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2010/06/07/no-secrets,
https://www.thenation.com/article/julian-assange-just-began-his-fifth-year-inside-the-ecuadorian-embassy/,
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-11047811,
http://conservativetribune.com/wikileaks-reveals-hillary-murder/?utm_source=Em,
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-11047811
http://constitution.com/hillary-clinton-pushed-assassinate-journalist-julian-assange/.
http://heatst.com/politics/october-surprise-thwarted-wikileaks-cancels-highly-anticipated-tuesday-announcement-due-to-security-concerns/?AID=7236,
http://theblacksphere.net/2016/10/john-kerry-asked-ecuador-stop-assange-leaking-emails/,
http://totalconservative.com/wikileaks-state-party-severed-assanges-internet-connection/,
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20161021171120AA9oEac,
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110307/03495713380/does-president-bush-speaking-out-against-julian-assange-prejudice-case-against-him.shtml,
http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/301527-state-dept-denies-kerry-asked-ecuador-to-halt-clinton-wikileaks-dumps
http://www.teaparty.org/assange-lashes-america-rigged-primary-rigged-media-rigged-candidate-193783/,
http://www.wnd.com/2016/10/assange-attacks-u-s-media-bias-with-1-chilling-word/?cat_orig=world
https://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/02/when-it-comes-to-assange-r-pe-case-the-swedes-are-making-it-up-as-they-go-along/,
http://warincontext.org/2010/12/10/case-against-assange-begins-to-unravel/,
http://www.teaparty.org/julian-assange-crazed-clinton-campaign-tried-hack-wikileaks-195020/

2 Comments

Kapernick versus the Anthem and the Flag, a Lesson for All

9/22/2016

2 Comments

Kapernick versus the Anthem and the Flag, a Lesson for All

By Susan Steffen-Kraft

Quite frankly, I don't care if Colin Kapernick stands for the flag and anthem or if he doesn't. It is his right to not stand as our servicemen and women fought for his freedom and right to kneel or sit. If he feels what he is doing will fix the problem with the police and black people, which I fail to see it would because the problem is being blown up by the media, BLM, and liberals. He is just a useful tool for malcontents.

Do I worship the flag and anthem? No, I do not! They merely stand for something we should be following today which is the Declaration of Independence, Constitution, and the Bill of Rights.
I have never once heard him speak up for those 3 documents; and he should have as the flag is a piece of cloth and the anthem is a song. Now, do I stand up; why yes, yes I do. But do they represent what they should; well, not really many times anymore if I am truthful, because of the perversity's in our government, but I doubt Colin truly understands the how and why of that.

I stand by our military and the need for one even though I disapprove of the wars where we go invade other countries; I want our boys brought back home. Do I stand with our police; yes, I do, but only if they are doing the right thing and supporting our 3 sacred documents which some seem not to even know or understand.

So where was Colin when Jack Yantis the rancher from Idaho was murdered by lawless cops? I could give other examples, but of course, as in the case of Yantis who was only a white rancher, Colin and the BLM were not there to protest. Protest for black people being mistreated and you should be protesting for all people.

As for the NFL and Roger Goodell; shame on them for allowing Kapernick to not stand and honor the flag and anthem and yet, they refused to allow the Dallas Cowboys' request to wear a decal on their helmets during their season paying tribute to the five officers killed in a July 7, 2016 ambush. Fair is fair and apparently Goodell and the NFL are favoring Colin and the 49ers. How wrong is that? Note that Colin Kapernick did not protest that move.

How about protesting how the N. Dakota Indians are being treated over this pipeline situation. They feel very violated from everything I have read and gathered. Has he done one thing to help them? I have not read that he has. Their rights should be important also, but that is a story in itself. If he is making a statement for justice then kneel or sit for Yantis and the N. Dakota Indians. In fact just stand for their rights.

Below, the picture of how the Seahawks team did it. The flag was there and the players were sending a message of love and unity. The players, coaches and team personnel linked arms in front of a huge American flag that was stretched across Century Link field.No defiance offered but the message was still delivered. Seahawks wide receiver Doug Baldwin said. "We wanted to do something together as a team. The statement that we're making, is obviously we want to honor those lives that have been lost 15 years ago on this tragic day (9/11), also honor those who have sacrificed their lives for the freedom that we cherish.
"We want to ensure that freedom and the security of justice for all people," he added. "It's a situation where you've heard us. The message is very clear. You've heard us. Now we're asking you to listen to our message. It's as simple as that."
Bravo, Seattle Seahawks. You covered it all and covered it well.

A flag is a piece of cloth or similar material which is usually oblong or square. It is usually attached by one edge to a pole or rope and typically is used as the symbol or emblem of a country or institution or as a decoration during public festivities. A flag made of white material of any kind, from a hanky to white paper is suppose to be a symbol of surrender or truce. If it is carried then the person carrying it is not to fire on or be fired upon as he is coming to surrender or negotiate.

Flags have also been used in the old days of wooden ships. One ship would hang out the enemy flag and then maneuver close through this deception to attack the ship of the enemy. Thus, we see that flags are useful in different ways; for good or bad. A flag is a useful piece of fabric that is typically used as a symbol, or even for sending a signal. Some flags are used only for decoration but as a rule they are messages from a person or a group.

Knights would carry flags into battle because being covered in armor it was hard to know who was who and flags helped the soldiers tell their friends from their enemies. Not nice to kill one of your own! There are many organizations or groups as in the Girl Scouts or even the United Nations who have flags. Clubs and organizations have their own flags too and the Olympic flag has five circles which represent the coming together of people from five continents in friendly competition; alright, mostly friendly.
Thus, the use of a piece of cloth as a flag has meanings and reasons behind it.

The colors found in flags have special meanings:
Red - danger, revolution, bloodshed of war, courage, power
White - peace, surrender, truce
Orange- courage, sacrifice
Green - safety, land, youth, hope
Yellow - caution, gold
Black - mourning, death

A brief history lesson on the Star Spangled Banner (a picture of Francis Scott Key above) and its words and meaning...Can You See Our Flag or Has It Been Defeated?

"O! say can you see by the dawn’s early light,/What so proudly we hailed at the twilight’s last gleaming: As the sun is rising after a long night of British bombardment of our fort, can you see the flag that was flying last night as the sun set, which, as Americans, we had proudly hailed (saluted) as the light faded and the attack began?
Whose broad stripes and bright stars through the perilous fight,/O’er the ramparts we watched, were so gallantly streaming?: We could see the flag at the ramparts, or defensive wall, of the fort, flying high during the battle.
And the rockets’ red glare, the bombs bursting in air,/Gave proof through the night that our flag was still there: All through the night, the exploding British missiles periodically lit up the flag; every so often we could see that it was still flying, and we had hope that the fort had not surrendered.

O! say does that star-spangled banner yet wave,/O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave?: Tell me, is the flag still flying, meaning we have not lost the war, and our nation is still free? (Or is the very different flag of Britain flying over Fort McHenry?)

It is an anguished question about the fate of the nation, that first stanza. It’s odd that we don’t sing the other stanzas, which are just as dramatic but more victorious. Stanza 2 reveals that the flag is indeed there: “Now it catches the gleam of the morning’s first beam,/In full glory reflected now shines in the stream:/’Tis the star-spangled banner, O! long may it wave/O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave.”

Stanza 3 vents some fury at the British: “And where is that band who so vauntingly swore/That the havoc of war and the battle’s confusion,/A home and a country, should leave us no more?/Their blood has washed out their foul footsteps’ pollution./No refuge could save the hireling and slave/From the terror of flight, or the gloom of the grave”.
Stanza 4 is fully triumphant:

O! thus be it ever, when freemen shall stand
Between their loved home and the war’s desolation.
Blest with vict’ry and peace, may the Heav’n rescued land
Praise the Power that hath made and preserved us a nation!
Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just,
And this be our motto: “In God is our trust;”
And the star-spangled banner in triumph shall wave
O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave!"

From https://thehistoricpresent.com/2011/06/29/what-does-the-united-states-national-anthem-mean/

Many know not about the information above and that would include Mr. Kapernick and his cohorts. In his case, ignorance truly is bliss!

I don't ask that he stands, I just ask that he understands! He needs to understand the meaning before he does what he does!

So which is it Colin Kapernick; just in case you are that ignorant? For me the only things Americans should "celebrate" when they stand up for "The Star Spangled Banner" is their nation and their freedom. Freedom bought at the cost of blood, and loss sometimes of fortune, honor, and life in order to establish and maintain justice and freedom. So Colin, do you even know what that means? I fear that many besides you do not! It does not mean you have to agree with a war or that you do not have a right to be upset, nay, even angry that sometimes there are people unfairly treated by others. That has happened too often through history. Humans can be cruel, stupid and very ugly acting. However, when you do what you are doing remember that:

1. You have that right because someone in the past fought for that right for you.
2. They fought and died for freedom and justice even though it is far from perfect.
3. We honor these freedoms the best by standing for them in a solid situation and not in an abstract one. We should decry them when injustices are existing in our government, taxes, laws, courts, criminal justice systems, and yes, sometimes with the police.
4. When you stand for justice and against evil then acknowledge the good and true in these places and people and praise them.
5. Now for those of you don't like what he is doing, please remember, that although he is doing it in a way you may not agree with, he has the right to do what he is doing! We have a right to peaceably assemble according to the First Amendment and he is being peaceable! I hope he realizes that his right to do this protest is protected by that Amendment.
Colin has not betrayed his country but he is doing and approaching it in the wrong way in my humble opinion. There are better and other ways including standing up for those who have been murdered wrongly and those whose rights are being violated by our government; race, age, gender and faith should not matter!

All of you that support this movement of Colin's please do so for the right reasons and remember this,

FRANCIS SCOTT KEY SAID, “HE REMEMBERED WHAT GEORGE WASHINGTON HAD SAID --- HE SAID, “THE THING THAT SETS THE AMERICAN CHRISTIAN APART FROM ALL OTHER PEOPLE IN THE WORLD IS HE WILL DIE ON HIS FEET BEFORE HE’LL LIVE ON HIS KNEES.”

So Mr. Kapernick, it seems you would rather live on your knees then die standing. For me, that says a lot about you!

,

https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=what%20does%20flags%20stand%20for,
http://www.worldflags101.com/other-flags/white-flag.aspx,
http://www.globalresearch.ca/war-and-the-danger-of-false-flags-when-governments-apply-the-old-schoolyard-bully-trick-he-hit-me-first/5395471,
http://chinese-school.netfirms.com/other-article-flags.html,
http://www.seattlepi.com/sports/football/article/Seahawks-link-arms-in-demonstration-of-unity-9216047.php,
http://ijr.com/2016/08/684228-national-anthem-verse-celebrating-slavery-being-used-to-justify-kaepernick-is-really-bad-defense/,
http://americanvision.org/13599/the-flag-the-bible-and-the-real-way-to-honor-the-righteous-fallen/,
http://daily.jstor.org/why-do-we-have-national-anthems/,
https://thehistoricpresent.com/2011/06/29/what-does-the-united-states-national-anthem-mean/,
http://www.foxnews.com/sports/2016/08/12/nfl-denies-cowboys-request-to-wear-decal-honoring-fallen-dallas-officers.html,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_shooting_of_Dallas_police_officers,
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=155640.0,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

2 Comments

Germany, No Longer Strong or Tough!

8/23/2016

0 Comments

Germany, No Longer Strong or Tough!

By Susan Steffen-Kraft

Here's to you Mrs. Robinson; oops, Mrs. Merkel who by the by is married. To look at her coy flirting with this young man from Syria after a visit to a refugee camp you would never know. Perhaps she would be better served trying to control the mess that immigrant refugees have made in her country instead of smiling flirtatiously at the young Syrian man's camera and taking the picture with him. She has in my opinion de-balled most German men as they stand by and seem to do nothing either.

Where were the men when hundreds of women were victims of assault in Cologne, Hamburg among other German cities. They are apparently scared of Angela Merkel with her open arms to these refugees from various countries. Most of the perpetrators in the mess at the city of Cologne, stand accused of groping and facilitating these sexual assaults as part of a group. This group accusation makes it all the more difficult to prosecute. So the lawmakers have failed apparently by doing it this way. Many of those that were part of this will never even be fully prosecuted and identified.

German citizens and in particular the men need to get themselves into the streets for peaceful demonstrations. They need to do this for their women and children.
I ask what is wrong with Merkel and I question her state of mind. Of intense interest is that migrants are being housed in a 4 star hotel in Germany. Germans themselves, are being ordered to leave their homes to allow these people seeking asylum a place to stay. Is this fair? Oh hell, no. Meanwhile, the refugees complain they don't have enough goodies and break the hotel rules. Sounds like some people on welfare over here in the USA when they don't get what they want.

Taxpayers in Germany are being burdened with paying the bill for the police officers and police cars that are there on a permanent basis. Do I feel for those taxpayers as in the U.S. we too are burdened with nonsense that steals are tax money.

Among many attacks besides the sexual groping and sexual assaults mentioned above that have happened because of this woman's open door policy, are that a refugee used a machete that he used to kill a pregnant woman and also injured two others before he was arrested in the city of Reutlingen, Germany. Thanks, Mrs. Merkel and I am sure her family members thank you. Sarcasm intended!

An unaccompanied minor who was upset enough to swing an ax on a train in Bavaria. He had registered as a refugee June 30, 2015 of last year. Then there was the man who after being denied asylum injured 12 people outside of a wine bar in Ansback near Nuremberg. He did not have a ticket so he threw a temper tantrum with the attitude of I will show them; and he did by detonating a DIY bomb filled with metal shavings and screws which was creative to say the least.

The esteemed (as I laughingly call him) mayor of Berlin wanted to illegally change German law in order to take over the homes of German people in search of accommodation for these migrants. Why wasn’t this diabolical conspiracy addressed by Chancellor Merkel or her government? Well, because Merkel obviously agrees with this or she would have spoken out. This is causing Chancellor Merkel and all her pro-migrant friends in the government and the media to be very unpopular. A storm is brewing and it is about time.

Tania Kambouri is a police officer in Germany and on a radio show said that, “For weeks, months and years I have noticed that Muslims, mostly young men, do not have even a minimum level of respect for the police,” she said. “When we are out patrolling the streets, we are verbally abused by young Musliims.

"I wish that these problems were recognized and clearly addressed. If necessary, laws need to be strengthened. It is also very important that the … judges issue effective rulings. It cannot be that offenders continue to fill the police files, hurt us physically, insult us, whatever, and there are no consequences. Many cases are closed, or offenders are released on probation. What is happening in the courts today is a joke. The growing disrespect, the increased violence against police because "we are losing control of our streets."

Coalition allies of the beleaguered leader have now added to criticism of the Chancellor, linking her failure to regain control over Europe’s migrant crisis to Britain’s decision to leave the Brussels. Mrs. Merkel has been widely criticized after the UK’s EU referendum on June 23. Several big wig politicians are now claiming Mrs Merkels open-doors policy on refugees was what gave Euro skeptics the ammunition and force they needed to abandon the Euro bloc. Indeed they should be thankful for that. Out of evil and chaos comes something good. The Social Democrats (SPD) have even gone so far by slamming the Chancellor for failing to unite Europe after the Euro crisis in 2009. They happen to partner with Merkel's Conservative Party.

The picture below well I have seen several pictures of her kissing our President and trying to kiss other men; shameless hussy!

She has failed in her duty to protect her country and its citizens. She has blood on her hands because in truth she has compromised the safety of people that have trusted her. There is no room for political correctness here; only swift action resulting in kicking out of her country those who have an agenda to try and are behind Germany being torn apart. Angela Merkel is a coward and a simpering flirt with the young male refugees. She is disgusting and unfit to be the head of this country.

Germany will not be the same if Merkel allows the 800,000 refugees, of whom many are bogus, that her government wants to allow into the country. A tight fit to bring that many in which is only one of the problems. The “change” that she is refers to, is the attempt to turn Germany from a majority White country into a minority White country. This is being done on purpose. A UN report released in January 2000, entitled “Replacement Migration: a solution to declining and aging populations,” Europe and Germany would need 159 million immigrants by the year 2025 and you have to be curious how such an accurate estimate was made unless there was a plan in place. White children of the future will be a minority in their own countries and Merkel is working to put that plan into place. Germans beware....I have not been your biggest fan but this is ridiculous.

Protect your woman and children! You better believe that your government and your media are corrupt right to the bottom of the barrel. Time to step up and say and do something. German men in particular, no longer tough and no long trying to protect their wives and daughters. Those chanting the slogan "Refugees are welcome here" may regret it when the females are raped, molested, and forced to wear burka and to follow their laws of lifestyle. Most are coming to change Germany and not accept the German way of life. It is the Angela Merkel way!

I hope deep down inside me that she is carried off to a Muslim refugee camp full of men and made to feel the full horror of what those young women have gone through. But seeing those flirtatious pictures, she just might enjoy herself.

I leave you with one of her statements reported July 30, 2016 which is this,

"she did the right thing by allowing hundreds of thousands of refugees enter Germany last year". This is despite three horrific attacks in the country having been committed by asylum seekers this month alone.
The German chancellor declared this week she “stands by” the decision to take in thousands since last summer.
She said: “I stand by the political decisions we’ve made.
“As chancellor, I am responsible for, by far, most decisions.
“I always have to weigh up if a decision meets our values — which does not mean that there are no risks.”

No risks Angela but you are toying with people's lives. There should be no risks taken the way you are taking them.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/07/10/leaked-document-says-2000-men-allegedly-assaulted-1200-german-women-on-new-years-eve/,
https://www.thetrumpet.com/article/13384.2.0.0/germany-migrants-and-angela-merkels-big-lie,
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/685617/Brexit-blame-game-Government-German-Chancellor-Angela-Merkel-EU-chaos-fault,
http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2016/03/germany-crisis-angela-merkel-refugees-and-rise-right,
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3705817/Angela-Merkel-backlash-open-door-immigration-German-attacks.html,
http://www.infowars.com/migrants-stay-at-4-star-hotel-while-poor-germans-lose-their-homes/,
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/07/23/munich-shooting-german-iranian-gunman-targeted-children-outside/
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/696646/Thomas-Salbey-Munich-shooter-Ali-Sonboly-prosecution,
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/664336/Angela-Merkel-awkward-kisses-world-leaders-Barack-Obama-Gordon-Brown,
https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2015/11/12/europes-refugee-crisis-and-the-kalergi-plan-for-white-genocide/,
http://whitegenocideproject.com/merkel-finally-admits-that-pseudo-refugees-will-change-germany-forever/,
https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2015-09-09/why-germany-welcomes-refugees,
http://eheadlines.com/shameless-merkel-defends-open-door-asylum-policy-despite-deadly-attacks-by-refugees/

0 Comments

<<Previous

Lessons from the Sheriff Versus the Governor

By Susan Steffen-Kraft

Operation Northwoods: Could it Happen Again or Has It?

By Susan Steffen-Kraft

King George III a Conservative and George Washington a Liberal

By Susan Steffen-Kraft

Quotes to Learn From Our Founding Fathers

By Susan Steffen-Kraft

Ovca versus Shark....What can we Learn?

By Susan Steffen-Kraft

Will We Ever Learn What is Important?

By Susan Steffen-Kraft

By Susan Steffen-Kraft

Who's Afraid of the Big Bad Julian?

By Susan Steffen-Kraft

Kapernick versus the Anthem and the Flag, a Lesson for All

By Susan Steffen-Kraft

By Susan Steffen-Kraft

​

Author

Archives

Categories